Round-Robin Mini-Debates

Intermediate (B1) 30 minutes
EAP debating activity preview for Intermediate (B1) showing debating, guided discussion, self-reflection, communicative practice and group work

EAP Debating Activity - Speaking: Debating, Guided Discussion, Self-reflection, Communicative Practice - Group Work

In this insightful debating activity, students rotate through three short debates on the same topic, taking turns to argue 'for', argue 'against', and moderate, reusing and improving good ideas as...

EAP Debating Activity - Speaking: Debating, Guided Discussion, Self-reflection, Communicative Practice - Group Work In this insightful debating activity, students rotate through three short debates on the same topic, taking turns to argue 'for', argue 'against', and moderate, reusing and improving good ideas as the activity progresses. For the first round, Student A argues 'for', Student B argues 'against', and Student C is the moderator. The moderator gives Student A and B one minute to plan their arguments using the debater cards. The debaters then present arguments for 30 seconds each, followed by 30-second responses to each other. The moderator oversees the debate, timing each segment and instructing debaters when to start and stop speaking. After each debate, students form new groups of three and switch roles so that across the three rounds each student completes all three roles. After the third debate, students return to their original groups to answer reflection questions individually and then discuss what they did well and what they could improve.

Academic Debate Challenge

Upper-intermediate (B2) 45 minutes
EAP Debating Game preview for Upper-intermediate B2: debating, communicative practice, group work

EAP Debating Game - Speaking: Debating, Communicative Practice - Group Work

In this engaging debating game, students compete to win a series of mini-debates by using strategy cards to build and respond to academic arguments. To begin, the moderator draws a topic card, reads it aloud, and assigns one student to argue 'for' and...

EAP Debating Game - Speaking: Debating, Communicative Practice - Group Work In this engaging debating game, students compete to win a series of mini-debates by using strategy cards to build and respond to academic arguments. To begin, the moderator draws a topic card, reads it aloud, and assigns one student to argue 'for' and the other to argue 'against' the proposition on the card. Each debater then picks up two strategy cards. Debaters must use both cards during the round to win. The two debaters begin by giving short opening statements, and then debate the topic using their strategy cards to build arguments and respond to their opponent, giving a final summary of their main argument at the end. Debaters then reveal their strategy cards and explain briefly how they used each one during the debate, with the moderator awarding the topic card to the debater who used their strategies most effectively. Students repeat this process several times using different topics and rotating roles. The student with the most topic cards after six rounds wins the game.

Debate Rebuttals

Upper-intermediate (B2) 55 minutes
EAP Debate Rebuttals Worksheet preview for Upper-intermediate B2: rebuttal structure, writing paragraphs, presenting, group work

EAP Debate Rebuttals Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Writing Paragraphs - Speaking Activity: Presenting Rebuttals, Freer Practice - Group Work

In this comprehensive debate rebuttals worksheet, students practice formulating and presenting rebuttals. First, students read a brief introduction to debate...

EAP Debate Rebuttals Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Writing Paragraphs - Speaking Activity: Presenting Rebuttals, Freer Practice - Group Work In this comprehensive debate rebuttals worksheet, students practice formulating and presenting rebuttals. First, students read a brief introduction to debate rebuttals and match key terms to their correct definitions. Next, students are introduced to the basic structure of a debate rebuttal and are provided with a complete example of a rebuttal that responds to a 'hasty generalisation' fallacy. Students then read about two other approaches to creating a rebuttal based on the fallacies of 'red herring' and 'bandwagon'. After that, students write a rebuttal to two counter-arguments following the structure in the example in which they identify the logical fallacy made in the counter-argument. Students then do online research to help them gather support for their arguments. These should include elements of logic, real-world examples, statistics, and quotes from experts or respected publications or institutions. Next, students take it in turns to present their rebuttals. Finally, the class decides which rebuttal was the most persuasive and why.

Let's Debate

Upper-intermediate (B2) 40 minutes
EAP Debating Activity preview for Upper-intermediate B2: opinion phrases, gap-fill, mini debates, pair work

EAP Debating Activity - Vocabulary Exercises: Categorising, Gap-fill - Speaking Activity: Debating, Freer and Communicative Practice - Pair Work

In this interesting debating skills activity, students practice phrases for expressing opinions, agreeing and disagreeing and then participate in a series of mini...

EAP Debating Activity - Vocabulary Exercises: Categorising, Gap-fill - Speaking Activity: Debating, Freer and Communicative Practice - Pair Work In this interesting debating skills activity, students practice phrases for expressing opinions, agreeing and disagreeing and then participate in a series of mini debates to practice the language. First, students write each phrase in a table under its correct function, expressing an opinion, agreeing, or disagreeing. Students then read a debate dialogue and complete each sentence with a suitable phrase. Next, in pairs, students debate a topic with one student agreeing with the topic statement and the other disagreeing. Students repeat this process several times using a different debate topic each time and swapping roles as they go to practice all the language.

Structuring an Argument

Upper-intermediate (B2) 30 minutes
EAP Structuring Arguments Worksheet preview for Upper-intermediate B2: matching, writing, presenting, pair work

EAP Structuring Arguments Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Matching, Writing Paragraphs, Revising - Speaking Activity: Presenting an Argument - Pair Work

In this useful structuring an argument worksheet, students learn, practice and present argument outlines and explanations. First, students match key...

EAP Structuring Arguments Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Matching, Writing Paragraphs, Revising - Speaking Activity: Presenting an Argument - Pair Work In this useful structuring an argument worksheet, students learn, practice and present argument outlines and explanations. First, students match key terms from the worksheet with their correct definitions. Next, students read through an explanation and example of an argument outline. In pairs, students then select a resolution and create a brief introduction to their argument using the example argument as a guide. After that, students read through an overview and example of an argument explanation. As with the argument outline, students create their own detailed explanation of their argument following the model provided in the example. Students then use a checklist to review and revise their argument. Finally, students present their argument to other pairs in turn. Each time students present their argument, one student presents the outline of the argument and the other presents the explanation, alternating roles each time. After both arguments have been presented, the pairs decide who presented the most convincing argument and why.

That may be true, but...

Upper-intermediate (B2) 30 minutes
EAP Counter-Arguments Activity preview for Upper-intermediate B2: matching, writing, delivering counter arguments, pair work

EAP Counter-Arguments Activity - Reading, Writing and Speaking: Matching, Writing Sentences, Delivering Counter Arguments, Freer Practice - Pair Work

In this productive counter-arguments speaking activity, students practice using partial agreement to counter arguments. First, students match statements...

EAP Counter-Arguments Activity - Reading, Writing and Speaking: Matching, Writing Sentences, Delivering Counter Arguments, Freer Practice - Pair Work In this productive counter-arguments speaking activity, students practice using partial agreement to counter arguments. First, students match statements with counter-arguments. Next, in pairs, students write four opinion statements on topics that people might disagree with. Students then consider the other side of the issue and write counter-arguments to their opinions. After that, students work individually to write four more opinion statements for their partner to counter. Finally, students take it in turns to read their statements to their partner, who gives a counter-argument using the phrases from the worksheet.

Common Logical Fallacies

Advanced (C1) 45 minutes
EAP Logical Fallacies Worksheet preview for Advanced C1: matching, categorising, creating examples, identifying fallacies

EAP Logical Fallacies Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Matching, Categorising, Writing Sentences - Speaking Activity: Identifying - Group Work

In this free logical fallacies worksheet, students become familiar with 12 common informal logical fallacies and practice identifying them. To begin...

EAP Logical Fallacies Worksheet - Reading and Writing Exercises: Matching, Categorising, Writing Sentences - Speaking Activity: Identifying - Group Work In this free logical fallacies worksheet, students become familiar with 12 common informal logical fallacies and practice identifying them. To begin, students read a short text about debating and logical fallacies and then match key terms from the text to their correct definitions. Next, students read explanations of 12 common logical fallacies and match them to examples. After that, students choose three of the logical fallacies from the list of 12 and create their own examples of each. Finally, in small groups, students take turns sharing one of their examples and the other students try to correctly identify the logical fallacy.

Debate Duel

Advanced (C1) 40 minutes
EAP debating game preview for Advanced (C1) showing debating, communicative practice, group work

EAP Debating Game - Speaking: Debating, Communicative Practice - Group Work

In this rewarding debating game, students compete in a series of short-form debates on contemporary issues, presenting arguments and rebuttals to persuade a judge and win topic cards. In groups, each student takes on the role of Starter, Challenger, or...

EAP Debating Game - Speaking: Debating, Communicative Practice - Group Work In this rewarding debating game, students compete in a series of short-form debates on contemporary issues, presenting arguments and rebuttals to persuade a judge and win topic cards. In groups, each student takes on the role of Starter, Challenger, or Judge, rotating roles clockwise each round. The Starter chooses one of their argument cards for the topic on the table and makes a statement, using the concept on the argument card to explain their position on the topic, e.g. 'Social media is the biggest threat to democracy in the 21st century because fake news and misinformation spread so easily.' The Challenger then chooses one of their argument cards and gives a counterclaim. The two students then debate the topic for two minutes. The Judge times and oversees the debate, ensuring both debaters have equal opportunities to speak and allowing 20 seconds per debater for closing statements. When the debate is over, the Judge awards the topic card to the winner based on the strength of their argument and how well they responded to their opponent's points. Students then remove the two argument cards from the game, turn over a new topic card and rotate roles. The first player to win three topic cards (debates) wins the game.

Understanding Academic Debates

Advanced (C1) 40 minutes
EAP Academic Debates Worksheet preview for Advanced C1: short answer, multiple-choice, true/false/not given

EAP Academic Debates Worksheet - Reading Exercises: Short Answer Questions, Multiple Choice, True, False or Not Given Questions

Here is a useful academic debates worksheet that introduces students to the way academic debates are conducted. First, students read the Affirmative team's opening statement addressing the motion...

EAP Academic Debates Worksheet - Reading Exercises: Short Answer Questions, Multiple-Choice, True, False or Not Given Questions Here is a useful academic debates worksheet that introduces students to the way academic debates are conducted. First, students read the Affirmative team's opening statement addressing the motion, 'Artificial Intelligence poses an existential threat to humanity' and answer questions about it. Next, students read the Negative team's opening statement and answer three multiple-choice questions. Students then read the Affirmative team's rebuttal to the Negative team's opening statement and answer questions with either true, false or not given. Finally, students read the Negative team's rebuttal and decide which of three summaries provided is the best.

Understanding Academic Debating

Academic debating involves presenting a position on a proposition, supporting it with reasons and evidence, and responding to an opposing case. It develops students' ability to explain their reasoning, listen critically and address points they may not personally agree with.

This page contains nine resources from intermediate (B1) to advanced (C1), including one free worksheet. The materials cover short debates, argument structure, partial agreement, rebuttals, logical fallacies and analysis of academic debate examples.

Use the language below to support clear exchanges. These examples are teaching suggestions, and debate roles and procedures should follow the format chosen for the lesson.

PurposeUseful languageTeaching focus
State a position 'Our position is that...' Address the proposition clearly before developing the argument.
Give a reason 'One reason for this is...' Explain how the reason supports the position.
Introduce evidence 'The findings reported by... suggest that...' Identify a real source and represent its findings accurately.
Acknowledge a point 'That may be true in some cases, but...' Recognise a valid point before explaining a limitation or disagreement.
Challenge reasoning 'This example does not establish that...' Identify the gap between the support offered and the conclusion drawn.
Request clarification 'Could you explain how that supports your claim?' Check understanding before responding.
Summarise a case 'Our main reason for supporting this position is...' Return to the central argument without simply repeating every point.

How to Develop Academic Debating Skills

Separate assigned positions from personal beliefs: Explain that students may argue a side as a learning task. Choose suitable propositions and give preparation time so they can explore reasons for either position without being expected to disclose personal experiences.

Require support rather than confident delivery alone: Ask students to explain why an example or source supports their claim. For researched debates, check the accuracy and relevance of sources; never encourage invented statistics or quotations to make an argument sound convincing.

Make listening part of the task: Have students note the opposing claim before responding. Use agreed turn lengths and moderator roles to create opportunities for both sides to speak, then assess whether responses address the argument actually presented.

3-Step Framework for Teaching Academic Debating

Use these stages across lessons, adjusting the level of support to the class. Short role-rotation debates provide an accessible starting point, while the language and researched rebuttal stages draw on upper-intermediate resources.

1. Experience both sides and the moderator role: Students prepare briefly, present a short argument and respond to an opponent. Across three rounds, they change groups and rotate through arguing for, arguing against and moderating. Reflection afterwards helps them identify what to improve in their next debate.

2. Build a usable language repertoire: Students categorise phrases for opinions, agreement and disagreement, then complete a model debate dialogue. They apply the phrases in paired mini-debates, changing topics and switching sides. Encourage choices that express their intended response rather than inserting a phrase mechanically.

3. Prepare and present a supported rebuttal: Students examine a model rebuttal and approaches to responding to flawed arguments. They write responses, research supporting material and present their rebuttals. Discuss which response was persuasive and why, checking its relevance, reasoning and evidence rather than judging delivery alone.

Common Mistakes with Academic Debating

Responding to a stronger claim than the opponent made: Changing the opposing position makes a rebuttal less relevant. Misrepresentation: Responding to 'Some lectures could be recorded' with 'You want to replace every teacher with videos.' Relevant response: 'Which lectures would be recorded, and how would students ask questions?' Clarify the actual proposal before challenging it.

Repeating disagreement without explaining it: A different opinion is not yet a rebuttal. Unsupported response: 'That is wrong. I disagree.' Better approach: Identify the particular claim, explain a weakness in its reasoning or evidence, and support the response. Students can begin with 'This example does not support the wider claim because...' and complete it with a relevant explanation.

Common Questions About Teaching Academic Debating

What worksheet helps teach students to structure an argument?

The worksheet Structuring an Argument guides students through an argument outline and a fuller explanation using models. Pairs choose a resolution, develop their argument and review it with a checklist. They then present to other pairs, alternating who gives the outline and explanation, and discuss which argument was most convincing.

How can students practice responding to opposing arguments?

The activity That may be true, but... develops responses through partial agreement. Students match statements with counter-arguments, write opinions and consider the other side of each issue. They then exchange further statements with a partner and respond using the supplied phrases, practicing acknowledgement alongside a reasoned challenge.

What game helps students practice academic debating?

The game Academic Debate Challenge gives students strategy cards to use during short debates. They present opening statements, respond to an opponent and summarise their position. Afterwards, they explain how they used their strategies, and a moderator awards the round based on their effectiveness. Roles rotate across different topics.

Become a Teach This Member

Get unlimited access to the full library, plus new resources added every week.

Unlimited Resource Access

Download from 3000+ worksheets, activities, and games.

Save 5+ Hours Weekly

Cut lesson prep time with ready-to-use resources, plus teacher notes and answer keys.

Trusted Professional Quality

Classroom-tested, editable resources created by experienced ESL professionals.

Fresh Content Weekly

Get 5 new resources added to the library each week.

Join Now Just $29.99 quarterly